Seems like it would be easy to get a boy to stop juggling in science class...but first you need to ask this critical question.Read More
We send our three children across the country to sleepaway camp - because we found a camp that fits all three kids and has everything one could dream of except waterskiing. They relax, disconnect, make new friends, try new things and make lots of independent choices. It's a terrific growth experience that they adore. They beg to go for longer and longer.
And we never saw the camp (NJY Camps) before sending the two boys three summers ago. We trusted that it was 90 years old, well regarded and had the sorts of things our kids like to do. We got very lucky. And this year, because they successfully convinced us to send them for long enough, they are there for visiting day. And so my husband and I crossed the country and drove from New York City to the beautiful Delaware River Gap to savor five-six hours with our kids. I learned some excellent lessons during this really great day (seriously - it was amazing and I want to go to camp).
- Visiting day starts at 10am. Except that we park next to the bunks for overflow and once the cars arrived…visiting day starts. At 9:15 we hit overflow. Not going to miss a minute.
- “No pets” doesn’t apply to people’s dogs. Dogs are family. Too hot to leave them in the car (clearly). Just disregard the camp’s request. Hope they brought pick-up bags.
- BBQ included. Except my kids really, really want cheeseburgers (kosher camp) so can we please, please leave and go to lunch. Us and 1000 other visiting parents. Traffic. OK.
- When dedicating five hours to the effort, bunks can be presented as clean and not smelly. Amazing.
- Apparently, there is a nefarious stamp thief on the loose in all the bunks.
- Socks really do disappear in the camp laundry.
- Even Moms can climb the lake iceberg and slide off the top. It’s not graceful, but it is possible.
- Jumping into water wearing a Mae West lifejacket (required) hurts when it bangs into the back of your head.
- The trust jump from a 4in x 4in ledge 50 feet up to hit a red ball in space is terrifying to parents and no big deal to all three kids. And yes, I climbed up and did it because one of the three asked me to do it.
- As I battled the stop and go traffic on country roads that only have traffic this 1 day per year, I longed wistfully for summers at camp and for a longer day with my three with a few more hugs.
The camp did a great job of ensuring the kids weren't sad when we left. As I walked out of the camp to meet my husband after dropping my daughter at her bunk, I saw hundreds of kids on the lawn having a massive watergun fight. Lots of laughter and already distant, but happy memories of Mom and Dad.
Suspensions are stupid – not to mention discriminatory and ineffective.
Suspensions are for adults, not for kids. There are times when kids make serious mistakes and judgment errors. Statistically, boys, especially boys of color and boys with learning differences, appear to make more of the mistakes that bother adults most – getting disciplined, detention or suspensions. To what effect? I don’t believe that boys are making more mistakes than girls – but their mistakes are more obvious and bothersome to adults – pushing, fighting, cursing – than girls who shun, manipulate and ostracize.
People learn from facing the consequences for their actions. Or do they? The entire premise of the US criminal justice system is that the probability and magnitude of punishment will deter crime. And yet, our country has the highest percentage of incarcerated adults in western society and doesn’t have the corresponding low crime rate. Furthermore, recidivism is very high among incarcerated US adults so it seems they did not learn from the consequence of prison.
Suspensions and detention are the academic version of incarceration. The child is separated, for a period of time, to atone for their errors. And studies are proving that just like prison, it doesn’t improve behavior either. In fact, it worsens it by grouping together kids who are struggling with impulsivity, anger or something else.
Even more frustrating is students in Special Education (all 13 categories) have twice as much probability of receiving a suspension than students without IDEA qualified disabilities (US Department of Education) – this does not include students covered by Section 504. In fact, one of every two students with a Learning Disability (and including AD/HD or other behavioral diagnoses) faced a school disciplinary action in 2011 (National Center for Learning Disabilities)
Suspensions can exacerbate anxiety and learning by keeping the child from education – and if the child is struggling in school, exacerbating feelings of shame often manifesting as troublesome behavior.
Summing up a variety of studies, the American Academy of Pediatrics maintains, “out-of-school suspension...[is] counterproductive to the intended goals, rarely if ever [is] necessary, and should not be considered as appropriate discipline in any but the most extreme and dangerous circumstances…”
The evidence against suspensions is mounting, resulting in school districts changing policies. For example, the School Board city of Oakland, CA just banned suspensions for “willful defiance” in exchange for more focus on why students are behaving a certain way.
San Francisco and Marin County have done so as well. And my local suburban schools have dramatically reduced suspension but have not yet eliminated it as a practice.
“San Francisco public schools began widespread use of restorative practices four years ago and has watched suspensions shrink by 49 percent.” - Seattle Times, 1/24/15
Suspension is for the adults – particularly for the lynch mob. It’s to be able to say – to parents or our colleagues and community – “we took action.” We followed the behavior policy and that child has been “held accountable.” It is a demonstration of raw power – we have the power to remove you – not of justice. Administrators admit that suspensions and detentions rarely do anything productive. Suspensions don’t address the environment or social circumstances that led to the issue. Administrators need to determine if they believe that recess skirmishes where no one is seriously harmed represent anything other than children dealing with conflict – not significant threats to school safety.
As parents, we need to support our administrators in using children’s mistakes as opportunities to learn. The best example is “restorative discipline” where the students involved are individually or collectively coached to reflect on the incident, talk through how their actions impacted other people without threat of recrimination, identify what happened for them and talk about how to deal with that situation in the future, determine how to make amends and then make them. This approach does not appease the lynch mob. No one is drawn and quartered. No one is publicly humiliated. Instead, students learn how their choices impact their community. And they learn to privately approach people they’ve upset and genuinely apologize – often the hardest and most impactful action.
Interestingly, in many cities in the US, the same concept is the approach for first time offenders and non-violent offenders. And their recidivism is dramatically lower than ours while crime rates fall. Isn’t it time that we replace a failed, counter productive model with something that ultimately creates a safer and more peaceful society?
What happens when you discover your teen child discovered Internet Porn. The average age when an American child encounters online porn is 11. Eleven. Not because they are (always) looking for it. Because it’s pervasive, inevitable and, quite frankly, interesting. What is the right thing for a progressive parent to do?Read More
I know what your daughter texts to my son. She’s sending (clothed) pictures and videos of herself. Did you know? She’s asking my son to kiss her at school. She alarmed me when I read her text that another boy is trying to hurt himself (I acted on that one and my son had already reached out to the boy to ensure he was safe). That said, most of their conversation is cute with emoji sprinkled throughout.
My son knows I can see his text messages. He told her as well – no one should think they have privacy if they don’t. He was complaining to her about it - but he knows the rules and he knows why too. He knows that I am his training-wheels into the world of digital dialogue. A world without tone and emotion, emoji notwithstanding. A world where a poor choice can cause you years of trouble.
Because I monitor my son’s text messages, I think he strives to be kind, appropriate and nicely funny. I think your daughters' and sons' feelings are much less likely to be accidently hurt because he’s thinking about the reader that he looks in the eye every morning and every night – me. He knows that he can talk with me about text-based peer pressure. Sometimes I bring it up – such as the concept that you only kiss someone when both you and the other person want to share a kiss – and that it should be private. Oh, and a gentleman never kisses and tells or talks about another person's body. Call me old fashioned.
I don’t plan to monitor his text messaging forever. All my kids understand that at any time, their parents can look at the phone and review their text history. And instagram. They will earn more privacy by showing judgment and responsibility. They know that too. Digital training wheels.
By the way, your daughter told my son that she's not allowed to date. I agree with you - sixth grade is too young (not sure how we stop in-school romances). But she's very curious about boys and that's normal. I hope you are reading her texts and talking to her too as she navigates this new, connected, world. Because I don't think everyone is reading their child's texts...
We cannot beat the devices – they have infiltrated our lives irreversibly. True – if one moves to a remote island, becomes Amish or sails around the world disconnected from civilization – one can avoid the digital devices. We cannot. Of course, if one cannot afford a digital device, one is facing more important challenges than this one. That said, since we don't want to eliminate all electronics from our lives, we have to find a way to live in harmony with the devices designed for distraction. I am thrilled that all summer, while at camp, my children experience life device free. But we don't have the stomach to live device free year round.
The effort to exert parental restriction on the digital devices was teaching our children how to become adept at evading detection and dishonesty. So what is worse - unmonitored use of digital devices where the device is quickly absorbing much of their unstructured time or the same thing, but having to discern if my child is lying, hiding or otherwise evading interference?
Our initial thoughts on battle strategies:
- Keep Parentkit on the devices (even though it blocks Spotify, Instagram and Safari) as a requirement for keeping the device
- Eliminate all games from the devices and ensure they have no way to put them back on by taking away their iTunes account where they use their iTunes gift cards.
- Switch from iPhone to Android where there are applications for parents to control the device remotely.
- Take away the devices
Every parent of an (upper) middle class middle-schooler seems to be embroiled in the same struggle. As far as struggles go, there are some much worse – our children are healthy and safe. So it’s a first world “problem”. That said, it’s our first world problem. We know that the devices keep our children from socializing face to face and creatively filling their free time. Or being bored. Or running around. They have unprecedented access to all types of entertainment – at their fingertips (more on that another time). And the answers aren’t simple – suburban tweens and teens communicate and make plans overwhelmingly through these devices.
Our goal is that our children are capable, as young adults, to make responsible choices about how they use technology. We had a family meeting to talk about what technology is doing to our family. We invited our children to make a contract with us as the providers of the phone and wireless service and to articulate what they thought was reasonable use and what the consequences would be if they violated the agreement. We wrote it out and it’s posted in our house. Here is what we agreed upon:
- No devices in bedrooms. Ever.
- No devices in the car until the trip is longer than one hour. There is no need to text in the car while going from place to place. If a text comes in, it can be addressed when you arrive at your destination.
- Everyone’s devices are placed in the charging stations by the front door when they arrive. This applies to Mom and Dad too. The au pair may take his upstairs. Use the new, super cool charging stations.
- Devices can be used for listening to music while doing homework. Devices can be used for listening to music on the bus.
- On the weekends or no-school days, individual devices can be used for 30 minutes per day for entertainment in a public space in the house. The child will set their timer after stating that they are going to use their 30 minutes. After that time, they can play together on the Xbox, play board games, cards, go outside, etc.
- On a weekend or no-school day when a child is alone in the house, they may have another 30-minute window.
And the consequences:
- First violation, lose device for one day
- Second violation, lose device for three days
- Third violation, lose device for full week
What do you think? How long do you think the treaty will keep the peace?
A picture is worth a thousand words. Show, don't tell. These are concepts we understand intuitively - and then often don't use in our parenting. Enjoy XPlane's work on Visual Parenting - some excellent ideas to both communicate effectively with children visually and encourage visual communication skills as well.
What visual parenting ideas do you have?